The palm: a tree, or an economic system?

The trunk is a roof, the frond is rope and baskets, and the date is food, dowry and provision. The palm is not one tree.

Noura Alshamsi
Noura Alshamsi Specialises in cultural anthropology and the intangible material heritage of the Hijaz.

To look at the palm as a plant is to miss the most important thing about it: that it was a complete system of production. Almost nothing in it went to waste.

The trunk went into the roofs of mud houses. The fronds were woven into baskets, mats and fans. The fibre made rope. The stones were fodder. And the dates were food stored for a full year.

Dates as currency

Dates entered the dowry, the labourer’s wage, the zakat and hospitality. That is, they performed the function of currency before currency spread: a store of value, a medium of exchange, and a standard.

Owning a palm

It is striking that ownership of a palm could be separated from ownership of the ground: one man owned the land and another owned palms standing in it. That small detail reveals a flexibility in the conception of property that modern law does not have.

Republish this article

This piece is available under a Attribution — NoDerivatives licence.

Specialises in cultural anthropology and the intangible material heritage of the Hijaz.

View all articles by this author

Join the conversation

Your email will not be published. Required fields are marked *